Columbia University Digital Knowledge Ventures
Columbia American History Online

Main Menu
E-Seminars
searchhelp

This is number 29 of 32 Point-Counterpoint excercises.

« prevnext »

Related resources:

Kennedy, Johnson, and the Great Society
The Vietnam War

Related topics:

NCHS-9
NCHS-10
NCSS-1
NCSS-5
NCSS-6
APUSH-31-A
APUSH-31-B
APUSH-31-C




Point-CounterpointPoint-Counterpoint

The War on Poverty

Contributing teacher: Michael Flamm
Time period: 1960s



Point
In his e-seminar Kennedy, Johnson and the Great Society, Alan Brinkley offers a measured assessment of the Great Society and, in particular, of the War on Poverty. He rejects the radical contention that the War on Poverty was a political response to social turmoil and mass pressure. He observes that, on the contrary, the Great Society was an elite initiative crafted by liberal policy makers who were confident about the future. But Professor Brinkley disputes the conservative contention that the War on Poverty was an unmitigated failure. He notes that poverty declined significantly between 1960 and 1970, particularly among the elderly, and asserts that, while the expansion of the American economy during that period contributed to that trend, Head Start, food stamps, Medicare, and other government programs also contributed much.

Counterpoint
In the decades since 1970, the War on Poverty has generated fierce partisan debate among social scientists and policy makers. Many liberal scholars contend that the Great Society reduced poverty, improved health care, and provided overdue aid to public education and job training. They also argue that the success of the War on Poverty was limited by political and fiscal constraints that urban unrest and the Vietnam War imposed on the Johnson administration. This view was put forth, for example, by Sar A. Levitan and Robert Taggart in The Promise of Greatness (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976). By contrast, conservative scholars maintain that the War on Poverty was fought and that it was lost. Charles Murray, for example, argues that ultimately the Great Society had little impact on poverty but instead led to an increase in welfare dependency and family disintegration, particularly among the urban poor. Conservative critiques of the War on Poverty include Martin Anderson's Welfare: The Political Economy of Welfare Reform in the United States (Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 1978), George Gilder's Wealth and Poverty (New York: Basic Books, 1981), and Charles Murray's Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (New York: Basic Books, 1984; 2d ed., 1994).



CAHO is being provided to you for your own use. Any copying or distribution of CAHO materials is prohibited.